Session Blog Reviews

Posts Tagged ‘networks’

In a move that went somewhat under the radar a month ago, Ning’s co-founder and CEO Gina Bianchini was replaced by COO Jason Rosenthal. This signaled the end of the of a few things: at the time, Bianchini’s long time influence on the platform. Then yesterday, the end of Ning’s free offering and the end of many jobs at Ning. TechCrunch reports One month after long-time Ning CEO Gina Bianchini was replaced by COO Jason Rosenthal , the company is making some major changes: It has just announced that it is killing off its free product, forcing existing free networks to either make the change to premium accounts or migrate their networks elsewhere. Rosenthal has also just announced that the company has cut nearly 70 people — over 40% of its staff. I have started my own Ning network on the free side so this news is not the best. I was getting ready to pay to have the ads removed from the network but not quite yet. I already pay to have my own domain used for the community. My concern is what will the fees be moving forward? Also, no one ever likes to get used to a certain way of doing things then have the rug yanked out from underneath them in one fell swoop. So until the fees are made known and a decision needs to be made there isn’t much to do. The company has said through its Creators network that the changes will be known in the next two weeks. To get the full scope of what Ning is doing here is the e-mail that was sent to the staff. On a side note, I wonder if these e-mails are written as more of a press release than an actual sentiment since it seems that they will not stay inside the corporate fence for very long. Here’s Ning’s version of the “Things Are Gonna Change But It’s Gonna Be Good” e-mail from CEO Jason Rosenthal. Team, When I became CEO 30 days ago, I told you I would take a hard look at our business. This process has brought real clarity to what’s working, what’s not, and what we need to do now to make Ning a big success. My main conclusion is that we need to double down on our premium services business. Our Premium Ning Networks like Friends or Enemies, Linkin Park, Shred or Die, Pickens Plan, and tens of thousands of others both drive 75% of our monthly US traffic, and those Network Creators need and will pay for many more services and features from us. So, we are going to change our strategy to devote 100% of our resources to building the winning product to capture this big opportunity. We will phase out our free service. Existing free networks will have the opportunity to either convert to paying for premium services, or transition off of Ning. We will judge ourselves by our ability to enable and power Premium Ning Networks at huge scale. And all of our product development capability will be devoted to making paying Network Creators extremely happy. As a consequence of this change, I have also made the very tough decision to reduce the size of our team from 167 people to 98 people. As hard as this is to do, I am confident that this is the right decision for our company, our business, and our customers. Marc and I will work diligently with everyone affected by this to help them find great opportunities at other companies. I’ve never seen a more talented and devoted team, and it has been my privilege to get to know and work with each and every one of you over the last 18 months. We’ll use today to say goodbye to our friends and teammates who will be leaving the company. Tomorrow, I will take you through, in detail, our plans for the next three months and our new focus. Thanks, Jason Rosenthal So it’s probably not a good day to be one of the Ning little guys that is not really driving much traffic is it? It’s a bad day to have a good idea that can bring specific groups together and enjoy many of the functions that small groups couldn’t have in the past. The days of free are looking like the days of the past for many things in the online space. Your take on this move?

Follow this link:
Ning Free Rides Coming to an End

New Media Plus Announces Launch of Social Media Marketing Blog Benzinga In addition to Social Media Marketing and Strategy and Social Networks and Platforms, the blog covers the following categories: Online Advertising, … and more

SAS Social Media Analytics Tool Extracts Marketing Data from Social Networks InfoToday.com Integrating with CRM and marketing systems, the solution aligns social media monitoring with overall business strategy and tactics. … SAS introduces social media analytics to enterprises ITWorld Canada From Seattle to San Francisco, Social is Everything ReadWriteWeb (blog) all 3 news articles

Lots of cool Twitter statistics coming out of Barracuda Networks new study (pdf). Where do I start? 21% of Twitter users are actually using the service–meaning that have at least 10 followers, follow at least 10 people, and have tweeted at least 10 times. 74% of Twitter users have less than 10 followers! However, that number is improving with a 30% increase in the number of users with 10+ followers (since June 2009) 60% of Twitter users follow less than 10 people 34% of Twitter users have more followers than others they are following, showing an 70% increase from 20% in June 2009 73% of users have less than 10 tweets, as compared to 79% in June 2009. 49% of Twitter users joined between November 2008 and April 2009–the period when many celebrities jumped on the Twitter bandwagon Twitter’s growth spiked at 21% in April 2009 Lastly, who tweets the most? Those with around 1,000 followers do: I’m guessing that’s the sweet spot of actually being able to engage and keep-up with your followers. ( via )

Go here to read the rest:
Study: 79% of Twitter Accounts Are Not Actively Used

For all of you complaining about the way Google Buzz invaded your privacy, the search engine has a perfectly simply explanation for you: It didn’t really care! OK, so Google hasn’t actually come out and made that statement, but it doesn’t take a genius to read between the lines: The BBC understands that Buzz was only tested internally and bypassed more extensive trials with external testers – used for many other Google services…Many of the firm’s new services are tested by the so-called Google Trusted Tester program…Buzz was not tested by this program. So basically, Google decided not to conduct its normal rigorous internal testing AND didn’t place Buzz in Google Labs–like it does with just about every other experimental new product. That leaves us to reason that either Google didn’t care, didn’t think, or got greedy. Which ever option you pick, it hardly paints a pretty picture, does it? Now, Google is faced with massive clean-up operation–practically changing Buzz every day –and by many accounts, has lost some of the respect of its users. To its credit, Google is now working “extremely hard” to fix the mess it created: [Google] has now set up a “war room” at Google HQ to bring together engineers and product managers to make decisions about what changes need to be made to Buzz. “If it becomes clear that people don’t think we’ve done enough, we’ll make more changes,” said Mr Jackson.  He acknowledged that many of the networks “tens of millions” of users were “rightfully upset” and that the firm was “very, very sorry”. “We know we need to improve things.” Before you comment, Yes I know that I am looking at this through my own biased filter–that’s what we do here–but you tell me? How in the world did Google make the decision to launch such an experimental product, in an area that it has had little home-grown success, without testing it for months? What is Google scared of, that it needed to rush Buzz to market? Facebook? Twitter? Or progress passing it by?

See more here:
Google Bypassed Internal Testing to Rush Buzz Out the Door?